Viewpoint

A viewpoint article is a type of scientific paper that expresses the personal opinion, perspective, or view of the author on a particular topic supported by the literature. Unlike original research article or systematic reviews, it does not present new experimental data or extensive data analysis. Instead, they offer insights, analysis, and critical evaluation of existing knowledge or trends in a specific field. It serves as a platform for experts and researchers to share their thoughts, experiences, and interpretations of current issues, controversies, or advancements in their respective fields. 

It is usually more subjective and less formal than original research article. While they are opinion-based, they should still be supported by evidence and logical arguments to maintain credibility. It is a medium through which authors can express their informed opinions, contribute unique viewpoints, and stimulate thoughtful discussions among readers. Additionally, viewpoint articles often encourage open discussion and debate within the academic and professional community, fostering the exchange of diverse perspectives on a given subject.

Viewpoints may share a few common features with commentaries, perspectives and a focus which is a brief, timely piece of information. It is like a ‘spotlight’ that contains information on research funding, policy issues and regulatory issues whereas a commentary is an in-depth analysis of a current matter which can also include educational policy, law besides any other seminal issue.

The components of a viewpoint article typically include:
1. Title: A concise and descriptive title that reflects the central theme of the viewpoint.
2. Abstract: A brief summary of the main points and arguments presented in the article.
3. Introduction:
Background: Provides context and background information on the topic. Clearly states the author's viewpoint or main argument.
Rationale: Explains the significance and relevance of the viewpoint in the context of the field. Discusses any existing gaps in knowledge or controversies related to the topic.
4. Literature Review: Summarizes relevant research and literature related to the viewpoint.
Provides an overview of existing knowledge and the state of the field.
5. Main Points or Arguments: Organizes the article into sections or subheadings, each presenting a different point or argument. Presents evidence, examples, or case studies to support the viewpoint in each section.
6. Personal Perspective: Allows the author to share personal insights and experiences related to the topic. Balances personal anecdotes with objective evidence and data.
7. Counterarguments: Addresses potential counterarguments or opposing viewpoints.
Offers a critical evaluation of conflicting perspectives and explains why the author's viewpoint remains valid.
8. Conclusion: Summarizes the main points discussed in the article. Restates the viewpoint and emphasizes its significance. May include suggestions for future research or practical implications.
9. References: Includes a list of all the sources cited in the article following the journal's citation style. 

Ethical Considerations: Ensures the article adheres to ethical guidelines regarding authorship, plagiarism, and data manipulation.
COI: Discloses any potential conflicts of interest that may have influenced.
Word Count: Abstract - up to 250 words and main text: 2000 to 4000 words
Referemces: Relevant and recent references (15 - 20)